Further enlightenment from the FBI
Updated: 28 January 2012 - 14:04 GMT
In order to keep FONEBOX.COM useful rather than gossipy, as stated on our About page, you won't find information on rumored devices here.In our view, this was a terrible idea. A better strategy would be what Western governments did in the 1950s with transport networks - they built autobahns (Germany), highways (USA) and motorways (UK) - creating the infrastructure vital to a mechanised economy. Likewise, governments should invest our taxes in constructing a high speed wireless network that offers consistent coverage and bandwidth across the nations of the world. This would benefit users, greasing the wheels of a digital economy, with the government obtaining a return through taxes.
Mobile ecommerce offers a massive economic opportunity - as proven by Apple's App Store, Amazon's offerings and more recently, the Android Market. However, even today, non WiFi high speed wireless broadband is not widespread enough and will take decades to achieve through the private sector - if ever! What is needed is a multi billion dollar/€/£ investment in a national wireless broadband infrastructure. Beyond the economic benefits, this will reduce the need to dig up every street to install wired broadband to homes and business. (For ultra high speed secure connections, fibre will still be required.)
On a related subject...
ADVERTISEMENT
Unlike cars that tend to get the job done (get you from A to B!) if they are in fairly good condition no matter their age, aging mobile phones become useless(1) fairly quickly due to the rapid advancements in technology that far exceed the pace of change in other industries - automotive included. While a vendor may want to sell you the latest toy, if they have spent a fortune on a prior model they need to recoup their investment.
The solution to this is often expensive, you track down a store - often online - that specialises in high spec unlocked handsets, or hit eBay.
Trusted sources of unlocked devices that may not be widely available on the high street (yet):
Global
UKKnow of a reputable supplier in your country or area? Feel free to get in touch.
Based on our own inside knowledge and common sense science, (not media hearsay), the truth is as follows - and only time will provide rock solid evidence: Any device that emits radio waves at specific frequencies will effect organic materials in the vicinity. What the effect is and how damaging it is all depends on the frequency, proximity and strength of the radiation, and the length of time living tissue is exposed to it. WiFi transmitters emit much stronger radio waves than mobile devices and in fact, there are individuals and schools that forbid WiFi devices in their vicinity.
Almost everything (we like!) is bad for us in excess or without protection, however, where we at FONEBOX.COM see a problem is that unlike the obvious harm from consuming too much chocolate, smoking or other such pleasures, the wireless industry has done little to get the facts across in an clear honest manner. There is an industry standard method to measure device radiation, the SAR rating, however very little predominance is given to this on device specifications when promoted. We believe that the more open the industry is, the less concerned consumers will be - they can make a informed decision.
With the young finding Bluetooth headsets 'uncool', children should be encouraged to keep their calls short or use text messaging /BBM - as most already do!